Per your directive, this office has finalized the messaging strategy regarding the Board's recent digital transformation and the deployment of the OnMark service provider portal.

We advise all regional desks to aggressively reiterate the Board's unwavering dedication to maintaining 'confidential academic records' and to praise the rollout of our highly 'secure digital examination infrastructure'.

It may be necessary to gently steer media inquiries away from the exact technical architecture, given that currently anyone on the internet can download any scanned booklet due to an insanely insecure AWS bucket configuration.

As per standard crisis procedure, we will attribute the discovery of this minor synchronization hiccup entirely to ethical hackers deflecting from the lack of internal oversight.

To preserve the illusion of forward momentum, it is imperative that we prevent the press from linking this deployment to the 2024 technical glitches in the result portal or the 2023 and 2018 question paper leaks requiring re-examinations.

✎ If asked, can we spin an 'insanely insecure AWS bucket' as a 'Radical Transparency in Education' initiative? Otherwise, just blame the service provider again.